I am a big fan of Dr. Vino, like many other wine bloggers his was the first wine blog I read, and I still enjoy reading it. That being said, I have to disagree with his Op-Ed column in the Times.
I have no issue with the idea of wineries and wine consumers becoming more ecologically aware, and I am not enough of a snob to think that wine only has to come in a bottle. In fact, I have plugged the French Rabbit wines several times.
There are two issues I have with the column:
1. I'd like to see some evidence to back up his claims about the carbon footprint, in particular if the 3 liter boxes generate half the carbon footprint during shipping, then why wouldn't 3 liter bottle do the same?
2. 97% of wines are meant to be consumed within a year? Most winemakers I know claim that their reds can age 5-10 years or more and even their whites can age 2-3 years.
But, ultimately, I think his piece ignores a fundamental truism about wine: Wine is about the experience, the excitement of opening the bottle and trying something new. Boxed wine is the opposite of that, boxed wine is about sameness about making every box the same. It is assembly line wine making.
His claim is that switching to more boxed wine will help increase wine sales, but if there is no excitment, no anticipation, if it is the same as buying a 6-pack of Pabst, then how will that encourage more people to drink?
Instead of looking at new packaging, if you want to help reduce the carboon footprint of your wine consumption, buy more wine from local wineries. If your local wineries suck, encourage them to make better wine. Sound ridiculous? It is no more ridiculous then asking boxed wine makers to make better wine.
I saw the Icewine from Denali Winery while we were in Skagway and the presentation is aweseome! It even includes a little jar with gold flecks in it.
It looks like most of the grapes Denali uses are sources from Washington State, but the wines are made on site.
Much more wine stuff to come...I'll be back on Tuesday.
Wine: Fabbioli Cellars 2005 Tre Sorelle

I'm leaving for an Alaskan cruise this Thursday. The cruise leaves from Seattle, so we are going to hang out there for a few days. While we are out there we are going to check out some of the wineries in Seattle.
Which got me thinking: how many wineries are in Alaska? It turns out there are four of them. Unfortunately, none of them are in places where we are going to stop. But, it looks like many of the wines are available at Wines International in Ketchikan, which is part of our trip :).
Wine: 2007 8 Chains North Lo.Co. Vino

Hiddencroft Vineyards sits in a secluded spot near Short Hills Mountain. The trip to winery requires a long drive down a dirt road with only their signs to guide visitors, but it is worth the visit.
Hiddencroft opened its doors on May 3rd and you can tell from the sparse tasting room that they are a young winery. The owners are friendly and enjoy talking about their wines, so you can find out everything you want to know. And, while the tasting room may be sparse, the Gazeebo is beautiful and takes advantage of the cooler temperatures in the valley to provide a great place to hang out and drink wine.
The highlight of the visit is the Sweet Cherry wine. A great summer wine, its a full-flavored wine that is made from 100% sour cherries with 5% residual sugar. Its a great wine to pair with chocolate or drink by itself.
The 2007 Cabernet Franc is also excellent, it is a blend of 2007 with some leftover 2005. The more bland 2005 takes some of the edge off this young wine making it less tannic but still with pepperiness of a good Virginia Cabernet Franc.



Wine: 2004 La Crema 9 Barrel Chardonnay
